Before a product, a doctrine. Cognitive security rests on a scientific foundation developed with academics and intelligence specialists: a framework to read and govern how AI enters the decision-making process.
Current regulatory frameworks — from the AI Act to corporate ethics — act on outputs. Cognitive AI Governance intervenes one level earlier: where AI structures the context in which a decision takes shape.
The algorithmic infrastructure that filters and pre-selects information before it reaches the conscious mind — beneath Kahneman’s Systems 1 and 2.
The gradual, irreversible outsourcing of thought to external, opaque AI systems, with loss of independent deliberation.
Four decision postures — exploratory, generative, critical, operational — to read how AI intervenes at each stage of a decision.
The index that measures an organisation’s cognitive posture across four dimensions; output: a Cognitive Health Index, trackable over time.
Executive experience with European boards and leaders: months of field work, over a hundred executives involved, a platform with posture switching and cognitive audit trails.
System-scale application within the CNR–AISES–SPES perimeter: training on cognitive sovereignty, technological monitoring and strategic advisory.
The Cognitive Sovereignty Index is developed jointly by the two organisations: it is the bridge linking advisory research to system-scale application.
